Burnout: exploring the differences between U.S. and international medical graduates.

BACKGROUND: International medical graduates (IMGs) have less burnout than U. S. medical school graduates (USMGs) during residency training. This study evaluates possible correlates of differences in burnout rates between USMGs and IMGs. METHODS: We surveyed 375 first-year residents at orientation in June/July 2017. We assessed burnout using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) and used validated scales to measure stress, quality of life (QoL), mastery, and spirituality. We collected data on gender, place of graduation, language fluency, and specialty. We compared CBI scores between USMGs and IMGs, performed a multivariate linear regression analysis of relationships between covariates and CBI subscales, and logistic regression analysis for our categorical definition of burnout. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two residents responded for a response rate of 59%. Personal, work or patient- related burnout was common among residents, particularly among USMGs. The most common form of burnout was work-related. Forty nine percent of USMGs have work burnout compared to 26% of IMGs (p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, being an IMG reduced odds of work-related and of total burnout by 50% (OR 0.5 C.I 0.25-0.99). Perceived mastery was associated with reductions in all subscales of burnout (p < 0.05). Stress and low QoL related to personal and work burnout scores (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Work-related burnout is more common among USMGs than in IMGs. Although mastery, QoL and stress were correlates of burnout among all residents, these factors did not explain the difference. Future studies should evaluate the role of medical school structure and curriculum on differences in burnout rates between the two groups.

Development of an Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Anti-racism Pledge as the Foundation for Action in an Academic Department of Neurology.

Racial inequities as illustrated by the health disparities in COVID19 infections and deaths, the recent killings of Black men and women by law enforcement, and the widening socioeconomic inequality and have brought systemic racism into a national conversation. These unprecedented times may have deleterious consequences, increasing stress, and trauma for many members of the neurology workforce. The Equity, Diversity, Inclusion and Anti-Racism Committee within our Department of Neurology provides infrastructure and guidance to foster a culture of belonging and addresses the well-being of faculty, staff, and trainees. Here, we present the creation and implementation of our Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Anti-Racism (EDIA) Pledge which was central to our committee's response to these unprecedented times. We outline the process of developing this unique EDIA Pledge and provide a roadmap for approaching these important topics through a CME Neurology Grand Rounds aimed at fostering a diverse, inclusive, equitable and antiracist work environment. Through the lived experiences of 4 faculty members, we identify the impact of bias and microaggressions, and encourage allyship and personal development for cultural intelligence. We hope these efforts will inspire Neurology departments and other academic institutions across the globe to make a similar pledge.

Practice Longer and Stronger: Maximizing the Physical Well-Being of Surgical Residents with Targeted Ergonomics Training.

OBJECTIVE: Pain and disability among surgeons can lead to practice restrictions, early retirement, and physician burnout. This project sought to address the physical well-being of surgical residents by teaching ergonomic principles, a "microbreaks" model, and stretching exercises aimed at targeting the four anatomical areas identified as most problematic for surgeons. DESIGN: Three modules, led by physical therapists, were presented to surgical residents over the course of the 2018-2019 academic year. These modules targeted specific problem areas for surgeons according to current literature. A perioperative micro-break model was also presented. Pre- and post-lecture surveys were administered to document pain, applicability of lecture content and effectiveness for use in the operating room (OR), and were reviewed retrospectively. SETTING: Jackson Memorial Hospital, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Miami, Florida RESULTS: A large number of participants reported pain in one or more body part (87%) prior to beginning this ergonomic training and 39% indicated that this pain was performance-limiting. The majority of residents (93%) who attended Module #3 reported that learning the targeted exercises and microbreaks model would help them physically perform better in the OR and, in fact, after practicing these exercises during this Module, 85% of residents reported decreased pain, especially in the areas of the cervical and lumbar spine. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data indicate that this novel curriculum was perceived as valuable by surgical residents and that practicing these targeted exercises reduced pain, particularly in the neck and lower back. Further research is needed to determine the longitudinal effects of this ergonomics curriculum on surgical resident well-being and whether these exercises will be effective in reducing pain and enhancing performance in the OR setting.

'Wargaming with the chiefs': A novel pre-mortem exercise to enhance communication and well-being among 'top gun' chief residents.

Pilots who complete the 'TOPGUN' program return to their squadrons as elite leaders and instructors. Physicians from all specialties who are selected to become Chief residents can also be viewed as 'Top Guns', as they are the 'cream of the crop'; having been chosen to be the leaders and role-models for all the other residents in their programs. Yet, unlike Top Gun pilots, Chief residents are arguably only minimally prepared for this new role. Wargaming involves generating every possible bad outcome and brainstorming contingencies for these possible outcomes. We developed an exercise for the incoming Chiefs (ICs) and outgoing Chiefs (OCs) in four specialties: Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Neurosurgery, and Neurology. Following this exercise, 100% of the Chiefs in all four programs indicated that this activity was beneficial and the majority agreed that wargaming improved communication and their own feelings of well-being. Based on our trainees' feedback, it appears that wargaming is a simple, fun, and highly-interactive exercise which increases perceived control among ICs and allows OCs the chance to reflect and share their knowledge and experience with the new Chiefs. This activity also seems to enhance communication and feelings of well-being among both incoming and outgoing Chief residents.

"Dread to treat" patients in cardiac surgery: Global strategies for interacting with cardiothoracic patients with substance use disorders.

Patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) who undergo valve repair or replacement are often readmitted to the hospital after discharge secondary to recidivism. These "dread to treat" patients pose a unique dilemma for cardiac surgeons who often must make the extremely difficult decision of whether to perform a valve replacement in a recidivist patient with SUDs. This editorial focuses on illuminating strategies which surgeons can administer to patients with SUDs to improve quality of care and reduce provider distress.

Counseling by Family Physicians: Implications for Training.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study explored family physicians' practice of providing psychosocial interventions in the form of counseling, their beliefs about the efficacy of their counseling, their preferences of who should provide counseling, the skills involved in counseling, and their training experiences in learning how to counsel. METHODS: A total of 230 faculty and residents completed written surveys at 11 family medicine residency programs in Florida. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent of study participants regularly offered counseling to their patients, 85% did so for psychosocial problems, and 94% did so for health behavior change. Compared to residents, faculty reported greater use of counseling and a greater willingness to counsel patients for depression or anxiety. Fifty-six percent of the sample stated that their counseling for mental health problems was effective. Sixty percent reported that their training provided them with a basic knowledge of counseling skills; training involved primarily observing a counselor or acting as a co-counselor with an identified counselor. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Motivational Interviewing, and the Stages-of-Change Model were the most widely taught counseling approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians regularly provide counseling for psychosocial problems and health behavior change, and a modest number believe counseling is effective. Residents counsel less regularly and are less confident in the effectiveness of their counseling compared to faculty. Training in counseling skills generally involves direct observation and learning several counseling techniques. Future research should explore whether models of family physician counseling are practical, which techniques should be taught and how.